Home   |   About us   |   Contact us   |   Request Callback  
 
   
ALREADY A MEMBER ?
Username
Password

Translate

This Page To:

 
NATHU RAM V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN, decided on Friday, December 16, 2016.
[ In the High Court of Rajasthan, Criminal Revision No. 1466 of 2016. ] 16/12/2016
Judge(s) : GOVERDHAN BARDHAR
Advocate(s) : Suresh Kumbhat. R.K. Bohra, PP.
Judgment Full Text : Existing LawyerServices Members, kindly login above.

Non Members, Enter your email address:- and , to request this judgment.

Alternatively, you may send a request by email to info@lawyerservices.in for the Full Text of this Judgment (chargeable).

LawyerServices Facebook Page

Judgments that may be related:-


  Madhu Gupta & Another Versus State NCT of Delhi,   21/07/2017.  

  Brijendra Singh & Others Versus State of Rajasthan,   27/04/2017.  

  Shanker Lal Versus The State of Rajasthan,   24/03/2017.  

  Shyopal Versus The State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor,   14/02/2017.  

  Jeewan Mal Versus State of Rajasthan & Another,   03/02/2017.  

  Kalu Ram Gurjar & Others Versus State of Rajasthan,   02/02/2017.  

  Sanwantaram & Others Versus State of Rajasthan ,   10/01/2017.  

  Jamaluddin & Others Versus State of Rajasthan through PP,   09/01/2017.  

  Prabhatai and Ors. Versus Chimote and Sons and Ors.,   30/08/2016.  

  Gangaram Nathu Satpute Versus Ahmednagar Merchants Co-operative Bank Ltd.,   09/08/2016.  

  Salman Khan & Others Versus State of Rajasthan & Others,   25/07/2016.  

  Nathulal Versus Nathi Bai,   31/05/2016.  

  Star Track Agency Private Limited Versus Efcalon Tie Up Private Limited,   20/05/2016.  

  Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Others Versus Nathu Lal Yogi,   28/04/2016.  

  Adi Dara Patel & Others Versus S. R. Jondhale & Others,   22/04/2016.  

  Bhagwan Sahay Meena (since deceased) through LRs Versus Bhonri Devi Meena & Others,   11/04/2016.  

  Gopal Lal Versus Nathu Ram & Others,   06/04/2016.  

  Murugan Versus State rep by Inspector of Police, Coimbatore District,   15/03/2016.  

  Sumathy Versus State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam,   08/03/2016.  

  Sarasamma Versus G. Pandurangan & Others,   04/03/2016.  

  Nathiya @ Nathu Lal Versus State of Rajasthan,   03/02/2016.  

  Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd., (Formerly known as Maharashtra State Electricity Board), through its Executive Engineer (Civil) Versus Dr. Sheshrao Baliram Ingole & Another,   02/02/2016.  

  LRs of Sunder Devi w/o Late Bhajan Lal & Another Versus Lal Chand s/o Shri Keshara Ram & Another,   11/01/2016.  

  Devi Singh Versus State of Rajasthan,   18/12/2015.  

  State of Himachal Pradesh Versus Mohammad Babu & Another,   16/12/2015.  

  Devi Singh Versus State of Rajasthan & Another,   01/12/2015.  

  Chhotu & Others Versus Board of Revenue & Others,   18/11/2015.  

  Ram Avtar Versus State of Haryana,   09/09/2015.  

  Sukhdev Ram (Deceased)Now Represented by Shyam Lal Sharma Versus Director, Consolidation of Lands & Others ,   07/08/2015.  

  Jhuntha Ram Versus State of Rajasthan ,   17/07/2015.  

  Anandi Lal @ Nanda Versus State of Rajasthan ,   15/07/2015.  

  A. Gomathi Versus A. Sangeetha,   24/06/2015.  

  Babu Shah Versus State of Rajasthan,   03/06/2015.  

  Nishan Saha Versus Paritosh Das & Another,   28/05/2015.  

  Rajasthan Housing Board Versus New Pink City Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd.,   01/05/2015.  

  S. Ganapathy Versus N. Senthilvel,   27/04/2015.  

  N. Natarajan Versus The Executive Officer, Chitlapakkam Town Panchayat, Kancheepuram District,   30/03/2015.  

  Nahar Singh & Others Versus State of Rajasthan & Another,   25/03/2015.  

  Prabhat Versus State of Rajasthan,   23/03/2015.  

  Anitha Tholia Versus State of Telangana, Department of Revenue, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat & Another,   20/02/2015.  

  Virdhi Chand Bohra Versus K.P. Sharma & Others,   18/02/2015.  

  Inder Singh & Others Versus State of Rajasthan,   06/01/2015.  

  Sk. Anisur & Another Versus The State of West Bengal,   02/12/2014.  

  Md. Jamal Miah Versus The State of Tripura, Represented by The Engineer-in-Chief & Secretary Public Works Department,   05/11/2014.  

  Naveen Shanker Lokure Versus Nascimento Milgares Pereira & Others,   19/09/2014.  

  State of Rajasthan Versus Chandgi Ram & Others,   09/09/2014.  

  The Bhajanpura Cooperative Urban Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. Versus Sushil Kumar & Another,   03/09/2014.  

  Tresa Xavier Versus Mary Simon & Others,   01/09/2014.  

  State of Rajasthan Versus Manoj Kumar & Others,   11/04/2014.  

  Subhash Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh,   28/03/2014.  




#LawyerServices #bestlegalsoftware #legalsoftware #judgment #caselaw









    1. By this criminal revision petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 16.11.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge Sojat (hereinafter referred to as 'the court below') in Sessions Case No.29/2016 (State v. Nathu Ram) whereby the charges against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Sections 302 & 201 IPC have been framed.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner while assailing the order dated 16.11.2016 has argued that the medical evidence falsifies the oral evidence. The Medical Officer opined that the cause of death of Smt. Dali alias Dimple wife of Nathuram could not be ascertained. As per Post Mortem Report the Larynx and Tracheae are healthy. As per the prosecution case that the petitioner strangulated the deceased is also falsified because Tracheae is not broken therefore the court below has grossly erred in framing charges against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Sections 302 IPC.3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the criminal revision petition and argued that the court below has rightly framed charges against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Sections 201 and 302 IPC therefore no interference is called for.4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the impugned order as well as material available on record.5. The court below has passed the following order on 16.11.2016 :-Add PP mi0A eqfYte ukFkwjke J/Cls mi0 dh J/Cdh vof/k fnukad 05-12-2016 rd cJ/Cls fnukad 05-12-2016 dks is'k fd;k tkosA cgl pktZ lquh xbZA eqfYte ij /kkjk 302 oa 201 IPCdk vkjksi i`Fkd ls fojfpr dj lquk;k o le>k;k x;kA eqfYte us vkjksi vLohdkj dj vUoh{kk pkghAiSjoh i{k ds xokgku 1 ls 3 fnukad 05-12-2016] 4 ls 6 fnuakd 06-12-2016] 7 ls 9 fnukad 07-12-2016] 10 ls 12 fnukad 09-12-2016 o 13 ls 15 fnukad 16-12-2016 ds fy;s B/W 2000/- ls ryc gksAi=koyh okLrs lk{; iSjoh i`Fkd~ fnukad 05-12-2016 dks is'k gksA6. From the perusal of the impugned order dated 16.11.2016 it is clear that the court below has not discussed the medical evidence as well as the Post Mortem report of the deceased while framing of charges for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. It is not clear that on what basis the court below has concluded to frame charge against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC.7. In view of the above fact situation this criminal revision petition is allowed and the order dated 16.11.2016 passed by Additional Sessions Judge Sojat in Sessions Case No.29/2016 (State v. Nathu Ram) is hereby quashed. The matter is remanded back to the Additional Sessions Judge Sojat with the direction to pass a fresh order of framing of charges against the petitioner after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties and after taking into consideration the medical evidence as well as the Post Mortem report of the deceased.Stay petition stands disposed of.Revision allowed.