Home   |   About us   |   Contact us   |   Request Callback  
 
   
ALREADY A MEMBER ?
Username
Password

Translate

This Page To:

 
MOTA RAM V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANOTHER , decided on Friday, August 5, 2016.
[ In the High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench, Criminal Misc. Petition No. 3418 of 2016. ] 05/08/2016
Judge(s) : KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
Advocate(s) : Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, Anoop Dhand. Jitendra Shrimali, Public Prosecutor.
Judgment Full Text : Existing LawyerServices Members, kindly login above.

Non Members, Enter your email address:- and , to request this judgment.

Alternatively, you may send a request by email to info@lawyerservices.in for the Full Text of this Judgment (chargeable).

LawyerServices Facebook Page

Judgments that may be related:-


  Mota Ram Lrs. & Others Versus Naina Ram Lrs. & Others,   26/04/2017.  

  Mota @ Motilal Versus State of Rajasthan,   28/09/2016.  

  Ramkishan Versus The State of Rajasthan,   23/08/2016.  

  Mota Ram Versus State of Rajasthan & Another,   05/08/2016.  

  Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT University) Versus G.V. Sampath & Others,   20/02/2015.  

  Balbeer Singh & Another Versus State of Rajasthan ,   09/01/2015.  

  Dnyaneshwar @ Bandu @ Lakhya Versus State of Maharashtra,   09/12/2014.  

  Inderjeet Singh & Others Versus State,   09/05/2014.  

  Gour Mani Roy & Another Versus State of Tripura,   10/04/2014.  

  Shanti Devi & Another Versus Pankaj & Another,   22/08/2013.  

  State of Punjab Versus Madan Mohan Lal Verma,   12/08/2013.  

  Mangal Singh Versus State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi,   16/07/2013.  

  Deepak Pradhan Versus State of Sikkim,   17/06/2013.  

  Mota Singh Versus Kiran Bhandari,   09/04/2013.  

  State of Rajasthan Versus Devaram,   13/02/2013.  

  Santoki Bai Versus Lal Shankar & Another,   11/12/2012.  

  Tarini Infrastructure Limited Versus Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. Though its Chairman and Managing Director, Sardar Patel & Others,   31/05/2012.  

  State of Sikkim Versus Rakesh Rai @ Vishal Rai @ Purna Rai & Another,   20/04/2012.  

  Goolrokh M Gupta Versus Burjor Pardiwala President & Others,   23/03/2012.  

  State Of Rajasthan Th. Secy. Home Dept. Versus Abdul Mannan & Others,   07/07/2011.  

  The State of Maharashtra & Others Versus Rajesh alias Akashsingh son of Shivprasad Sakhare & Others,   28/10/2010.  

  Vadilal Nandlal Shah and Others Versus Ramesh Dharamdas Mehta & Others,   15/09/2010.  

  SAHARA INDIA COMMERCIAL CORP. LTD. VERSUS STATE OF U.P.,   14/05/2010.  

  Mota Ram Versus Krishna & Others,   19/02/2010.  

  State of Rajasthan Versus Maniya,   22/01/2010.  

  ZAKIRHUSSAIN SHAKURBHAI SHAIKH VERSUS THE STATE OF GUJARAT,   23/12/2009.  

  Raju Chettri Versus State of Sikkim,   16/09/2009.  

  Jaswant Singh Versus Surinder Kaur Kohli ,   16/02/2009.  

  Bhupendra Alias Mota Patle Versus State of Chhattisgarh,   03/10/2007.  

  Harish Yadav & Another Versus CBI & Another ,   08/01/2007.  

  Delhi Council For Child Welfare Versus Sheela Devi & Another ,   28/08/2006.  

  M/s. A.P. Wine Dealers Association & Others Versus The Deputy Director of Income-Tax (Investigation) & Others ,   13/04/2005.  

  Hem Raj Versus Raja Ram and others ,   22/01/2004.  

  Bami Bewa Versus Krushna Chandra Swain @ Gochhayat,   16/09/2003.  

  Goswami Kalyanraiji Govindraiji Versus Goswami Vallabhraiji Govindraiji,   21/10/2002.  

  STATE BY PIRIYAPATNA POLICE VERSUS MOTA ALIAS MOTTA S/o MADIAH ,   25/08/2000.  

  Hari Ram Versus State,   15/09/1999.  

  State of Rajasthan Versus Teja Ram ,   19/03/1999.  

  State of Gujarat Versus Kantilal Ghelabhai Patel,   15/09/1998.  

  Motibai Sarvotham Pai Cano w/o Sarvotham Pai Cano & Others Versus Maria Elsa do Perpetuo Socorro Mota & Another ,   03/08/1993.  

  MOTIBAI SARVOTHAM PAI CANO W/o SARVOTHAM PAI CANO VERSUS MARIA ELSA DO PERPETUO SOCORRO MOTA ,   08/03/1993.  

  Mangu Versus State of Rajasthan,   23/08/1976.  

  Bhagwanti Lal Versus Bhore Lal,   01/03/1974.  

  Pukh Raj Versus Parbha,   13/03/1969.  

  Laxman Siddappa Naik Versus Kattimani Chaniappa Jamappanna and Others ,   19/01/1968.  

  Joshi Jayantilal Laxmishankar Versus Gujarat State,   28/11/1960.  

  Koli Tapu Dharamshi Versus State,   03/02/1955.  




#LawyerServices #bestlegalsoftware #legalsoftware #judgment #caselaw

  "2017 (3) CriCC 160"  ==   " 2017 (5) RCR(Cri) 61"  ==   ""  







    1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that the order dated 08.10.2015 whereby petitioner has been charged for the offences under Sections 451 354 IPC by the trial Court be set aside along with order dated 21.06.2016 passed by the Court of Sessions Judge Sikar who while exercising revisional powers has affirmed the order passed by the trial Court.2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that complainant Smt. Shankari Devi W/o Shankar Lal on 02.08.2009 had lodged a report that petitioner had made an attempt to outrage her modesty. She further stated that petitioner had trespassed into her house to commit the said offence. Petitioner has raised a plea that he is a police constable and at the relevant time was posted in the Office of Deputy Superintendent of Police Circle Fatehpur Sikar and was performing his duties. The plea of alibi has been raised by the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.1789/2012 and on 30.05.2012 a coordinate Bench of this Court had passed the following order:-Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the objections by way of the application at the stage of the charge arguments which he has raised through this petition. He submits that the court concerned be directed to decide the application first and then proceed further which is not opposed by the learned PP.The criminal misc. petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty and direction. The stay application also stands dismissed.3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that documents in favour of the petitioner have not been considered by the trial Court and the charges have been framed in a mechanical manner. Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon State of M.P. v. Mohanlal Soni (2000) 6 SCC 338 to contend that under the orders passed by the High Court documents made available by the accused during investigation can be taken into consideration by the trial Court while framing charges.4. The law laid in the case State of M.P. v. Mohanlal Soni (supra) no longer hold the field. A three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi (2003)2 SCC 711 had overruled the case of Satish Mehra v. Delhi Administration And Another (1996) 9 SCC 766. The Supreme Court in case of State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi (supra) also considered the law laid in State of M.P. v. Mohanlal Soni (supra). Besides the above contention raised by the petitioner it is settled legal position that who craves for exception has to prove the same to the hilt. The documents produced by the petitioner are not per se admissible. Hence the witnesses are required to be examined to prove the documents to prove the alibi. It cannot be ruled out that testimony of the witnesses examined by the accused in defence can be shattered by learned Public Prosecutor by rendering cross-examination. Therefore no interference is warranted. The better course for petitioner is to prove his plea of alibi by leading defence evidence.5. Hence present petition being devoid of merit is dismissed.Petition dismissed.