Home   |   About us   |   Contact us   |   Request Callback  


This Page To:

HARPAL SINGH V/S STATE OF U P, decided on Monday, April 20, 1992.
[ In the High Court of Allahabad, Criminal Misc. Application No. 4600 of 1992. ] 20/04/1992
Judge(s) : A.B. SRIVASTAVA
Advocate(s) :
Judgment Full Text : Existing LawyerServices Members, kindly login above.

Non Members, Enter your email address:- and , to request this judgment.

Alternatively, you may send a request by email to info@lawyerservices.in for the Full Text of this Judgment (chargeable).

LawyerServices Facebook Page

Judgments that may be related:-

  Bhootpurva Sainik Kalyan & Aam Janta, Through General Secretary, Harish Chand Verma Versus Area Commander, Head Office 61 (Independent) Sub- Area Military Area,   09/10/2017.  

  Radhey Shyam Dhakad Versus Jaivardhan Singh & Others,   12/09/2017.  

  W.W.A. Cossipore English School Versus The State of West Bengal & Others,   08/09/2017.  

  Harpal Singh Bundela & Another Versus State of Madhya Pradesh ,   06/09/2017.  

  Hussainali Sharif Punjwani Others Versus The Board of Trustees of Port of Bombay & Others,   13/06/2017.  

  Mehboob & Others Versus State (NCT of Delhi),   01/06/2017.  

  Sayeed Alarm Lari @ Babu Versus State of Haryana,   16/05/2017.  

  Baldev Singh & Others Versus State of H.P.,   29/04/2017.  

  Indian National Congress through its State Unit Versus Union of India through the Cabinet Secretary, Govt. of India, New Delhi & Others,   28/04/2017.  

  Vineet Arora Versus M/s. Emaar MGF Land Limited, (Mohali Hills), & Another,   25/04/2017.  

  Jagroop Singh & Another Versus State of Rajasthan,   17/04/2017.  

  Byasdev Haldar Versus State of West Bengal,   22/03/2017.  

  TMS Prakash Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Special Public Prosecutor for ACB,   15/03/2017.  

  State of H.P. Versus Raghubir Singh & Others,   02/03/2017.  

  Hanuman Hariyana Brahmin & Others Versus State of Rajasthan Through PP,   25/01/2017.  

  Raju & Others Versus State of Maharashtra,   16/01/2017.  

  Punjab Urban Development Authority & Others Versus Harpal Singh,   16/01/2017.  

  Upendra Rai, Saran At Chhapara Versus The State Of Bihar & Another,   12/01/2017.  

  Nara Chandrababu Naidu Versus The State of Telangana, represented by its Public Prosecutor & Another,   09/12/2016.  

  Shilpa Tandon Versus Harish Chand Tandon & Another,   15/11/2016.  

  Himachal Pradesh General Industries Corporation Ltd. Versus M/s. Hari Singh Harpal Singh,   03/11/2016.  

  Prakash Gobindram Ahuja Versus Ganesh Pandharinath Dhonde & Others,   04/10/2016.  

  Taranjit Singh @ Badal Versus State of H.P.,   29/09/2016.  

  Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Tara Singh (Through Lrs.) & Others,   28/09/2016.  

  Gurinderpal Singh & Others Versus Punjab State Power Corporation Limited through its Senior Executive Engineer ,   22/09/2016.  

  Purinma Sahni Versus Rati Sahni & Another,   07/09/2016.  

  Selvamani & Others Versus Minor K. Gomathi rep. by mother and guardian Angammal @ Kannammal & Another,   01/09/2016.  

  Promil Goyal Versus State of H.P. & Others,   22/08/2016.  

  Dev Dutt & Others Versus State of Uttar Pradesh,   10/08/2016.  

  In The Matter of: Mukesh & Others Versus State,   10/08/2016.  

  E.R. Vinod Versus State of Kerala Represented By Secretary to Government, Department of Law, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram,   27/07/2016.  

  Brij Lal and Company, Timber and Plywood Kailash Bhawan, HUDA Complex Versus Harpal Singh s/o Sh. Jai Bhagwan, Resident of Village Samar ,   20/07/2016.  

  Gurmeet Kour Versus Pyara Singh & Others ,   29/06/2016.  

  Imtiyaz Hussain Versus The Central Government Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Economic Intelligence Bureau & Another,   22/06/2016.  

  Kalyan Singh alias Bitto Versus State of Himachal Pradesh,   13/06/2016.  

  State of Himachal Pradesh Versus Negi Ram,   27/05/2016.  

  Dr. Satpal Kaur, Sharda Hospital Versus Veerpal Kaur,   18/05/2016.  

  Abhey Singh Versus State,   13/05/2016.  

  Ujjawal & Another Versus State of U.P.,   11/05/2016.  

  M/s. Universal Glass (A Division of Jagajit Ind. Ltd.) Versus Harpal Singh,   05/05/2016.  

  Harpal Singh alias Raju Versus Narcotics Control Bureau, Chandigarh,   03/05/2016.  

  State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Incharge & Another Versus Imdad Ali Waid Ali Sayyad & Another,   25/04/2016.  

  Devinder Singh & Others Versus State of Punjab through CBI,   25/04/2016.  

  Simarpreet Kaur & Others Versus Toyota Kirlosakar Motor Pvt. Ltd, Managing Director & Others,   12/04/2016.  

  Ram Chandra Mondal @ Ram Mondal & Another Versus The State of West Bengal,   07/04/2016.  

  Jahangir Seikh @ Naga Seikh Versus The State of West Bengal,   29/03/2016.  

  HDFC Bank Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax -2(3), Mumbai,   25/02/2016.  

  Vilasini & Others Versus Thankam Alias Thankamma,   22/02/2016.  

  Antar Singh Darbar Versus Kailash Vijayvargiya & Others ,   02/02/2016.  

  Satnam Singh @ Sata Versus State of Punjab ,   06/01/2016.  

#LawyerServices #bestlegalsoftware #legalsoftware #judgment #caselaw

  "1995 (2) JIC 2093"  ==   "1995 (26) ALLLR 200"  ==   "1995 (1) ALLCJ 504"  

    Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ? Section 482 -     A.B. SRIVASTAVA J. Heard the learned Counsel and the parties and perused the documents placed on record. This application can be disposed or finally on the admitted facts and circumstances. It appears that after charge-sheet was submitted and cognizance was taken the documents were sent to the copying section for preparation of copies. Subsequently it appears that the first information report was lost despite several orders being passed by the Magistrate the same could not be traced and restored. The trial Court lingered the case for this purpose for a few years. It also appears that learned Magistrate has not proceeded in the matter in a time bound manner and this has resulted into trial being protracted. However at this stage it is also not possible to quash the proceedings against the applicant unless an enquiry in accordance with rules in made by the learned Magistrate and findings be recorded that the relevant documents including the F. I. R. has been lodged and report reconstructed. 2. As such the learned Magistrate is directed to hold an enquiry into loss of the F. I. R. and other connected records within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order and in case he finds the documents to have been lost the reconstruction of docu ments should be accomplished within a period of one month next. If reconstruction of the document within the period of one month is not accomplished the Magistrate shall proceed to finally dispose of the case taking that the first information report and the other documents found to have been lost are not in existence and are not to be considered in evidence against the accused persons. The learned Magistrate shall finally dispose of the case Within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3. With these directions this application is finally disposed of. Appeal dispossed of.